Living guide · beta · last updated 1 November 2026 · Free for everyone. Missing something? Write to support@mrresearcher.com
Lesson 10 of 12 · Applied

AI at the bedside and in nursing

About 25 minutes · plain language

At the bedside, AI suggestions meet a real patient. The nurse is often the last person who can catch an AI error before it reaches the patient. This lesson explains the two biggest traps, and the nurse’s role before, during and after an AI tool is introduced.

By the end you can
  • Recognise automation bias and alert fatigue.
  • Describe the nurse’s role when an AI tool is introduced.

Key terms

Automation bias
The tendency to over-rely on automated advice, even when other information disagrees.Example: Accepting a “low risk” score despite a patient who looks unwell.
Error of commission
Doing something wrong because the tool suggested it.Example: Giving a dose the tool recommended without checking.
Error of omission
Missing something because the tool did not flag it.Example: Not escalating because no alert appeared.
Alert fatigue
When staff receive so many alerts that they start to ignore them, including important ones.Example: Dismissing every pop-up without reading it.
Human-in-the-loop
A design in which a person reviews AI output before action is taken.Example: A nurse confirms an AI-suggested care plan.
Silent trial
Running an AI tool in the background, without showing its output to staff, to check how it performs locally.Example: Comparing a hidden risk score with what actually happened for three months.
Shared decision-making
The patient and the professional decide together, using the best evidence and what matters to the patient.Example: Discussing a chatbot’s suggestion with a patient instead of dismissing it.
AI outputNurse’s own assessmentDecisionPatient
Automation biasFollowing the tool even when your own assessment disagrees
Alert fatigueSo many alerts that important ones are ignored
Your assessment sits between the tool and the patient. Two well-known traps sit beside it.

Your assessment comes first

The figure shows your place: between the AI output and the patient. The tool gives information; you make the assessment and the decision. Document your own findings, not “as per AI”.

Automation bias

People tend to trust automated advice too much. They accept wrong suggestions (errors of commission) and miss problems the tool did not flag (errors of omission). Systematic reviews find this bias in many health-care settings and show it is more likely when workload is high or when outputs are hard to verify. Simple habits help: look at the patient before the screen, and ask “does this fit what I see?”

Alert fatigue

When a tool fires too often, people start to dismiss alerts without reading them, including the important ones. Good tools are tuned with clinical staff so that alerts are fewer and more useful. If an alert is almost always wrong, report it rather than silently ignoring it.

The nurse’s role across the tool’s life

Before: help choose the tool and test it, for example in a silent trial. During: use it with your own judgement, override it when needed, and document your reasons. After: report outputs that look wrong and patterns you notice, such as a tool that often misses certain patients. Nursing bodies, including the American Nurses Association and the American Academy of Nursing, say nurses should help shape AI, not only use it.

Speak up

Your reports are how local monitoring works. A short note such as “score low, patient deteriorated, sepsis confirmed” helps the team retune or stop a tool before harm spreads.

When a patient brings an AI answer

More and more patients ask chatbots about their symptoms, results and medicines before or after they see you. Studies show that chatbot answers can sound clear and caring, sometimes more so than busy clinicians, and still contain errors. A patient who brings an AI answer is usually trying to understand and take part in their care. Treat it as a starting point for a conversation, not a challenge.

  • Ask and listen. “What did it tell you, and what worries you about it?”
  • Check together. Compare the answer with their actual results, medicines and plan, and with a trusted source (Lesson 5).
  • Correct clearly and kindly. Say what is right, what is wrong or does not apply to them, and why.
  • Protect privacy. Remind them not to upload full records or other people’s details to public tools.
  • Escalate and record. If the AI advice could cause harm, such as stopping a medicine, involve the prescriber and note the discussion.

Case: low score, sick patient

At 3 a.m. a deterioration score shows “low risk” for Mr S. The nurse notices new confusion and a respiratory rate that has risen from 18 to 26. She trusts her assessment, escalates, and the patient is treated for early sepsis. She records her own observations, not the score, and reports the mismatch. Three similar reports lead the team to discover that the tool did not use respiratory rate trends, and the vendor updates it.

Common mistakes

  • Silencing alerts without telling anyone.
  • Documenting “as per AI” instead of your own assessment.
  • Leaving tool selection to IT and vendors alone.

Check your understanding

1. A nurse does not escalate because no alert appeared. What kind of error is this?

An error of omission caused by automation bias.

2. Name one thing that makes automation bias more likely.

High workload, or outputs that are hard to verify.

3. What should you do with an alert that is nearly always wrong?

Report it so it can be reviewed and tuned; do not just silently ignore it.

4. A patient says a chatbot told her to stop her blood-pressure tablets because of a side effect. What do you do?

Listen to her concern, check the claim against her prescription and a trusted source, explain the risk of stopping suddenly, involve the prescriber, and record the conversation.

Try it

  • Think of an alert you often dismiss. What would make it more useful? Who could you tell?

Remember

  • Look at the patient before the screen.
  • Beware automation bias and alert fatigue.
  • Nurses should help choose, test and monitor AI tools.
  • A patient’s AI answer is a starting point for a conversation: listen, check together, correct kindly.
References
  1. American Nurses Association. The ethical use of artificial intelligence in nursing practice: position statement. ANA; 2022. Republished in: Online J Issues Nurs. 2025;30(2). ojin.nursingworld.org
  2. American Academy of Nursing. Position statement: artificial intelligence in health care. Washington (DC): AAN; 2026. aannet.org
  3. Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, et al. Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. Nat Med. 2022;28(5):924-33. doi.org
  4. Ibrahim FM, Shahrour G, et al. NAIL-G: a conceptual best-fit framework for nursing AI literacy and governance anchored in socio-technical safety. BMC Nurs. 2026;25. doi.org
  5. Goddard K, Roudsari A, Wyatt JC. Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(1):121-7. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Lyell D, Coiera E. Automation bias and verification complexity: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(2):423-31. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M, et al. Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(6):589-96. doi.org
  8. World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: guidance on large multi-modal models. Geneva: WHO; 2024. www.who.int

Lesson text is our own plain-language summary of these sources; it is not endorsed by their authors. Check the original before relying on any detail.